The Reversed Sustainability effect and mindset

Why are we getting here, crises after crises. Is this a systemic reaction of the economy or is something more profound!? Could this mindset be embedded in our thinking through our "Written DNA" !? 

1st Trade; 2nd Country; 3rd Growth;
4th Money; 5th Budget, 6th Markets;
7th Debt; 8th Savings; 9th Deficit



The Graph Link

The Reversed Sustainability Effect ...


The reading of the results and the conclusion:
Growth and Trade, they surpasses by far, Debt, Savings and Deficits.
► This is the current mainstream mindset▼

It doesn't matter how a country grows or how it will trade, as long as it does it with higher numbers, than it did in the previous period of comparison. That's why if a countries is accumulating debt and deficits in trade and in their budget, year after year, with a lower savings rate, and this is happening systematically. Accordingly to the mainstream governance opinion, it doesn't matter, as long as it continues to grow.
▼
This is the Reversed Sustainability effect.

The Reason: A country that work's accordingly to the current mainstream governance, and there are several countries doing this currently, these countries are accumulating wealth that belongs to someone else (their creditors).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unbalanced Economies and the Reversed sustainability effect

Image
Reversed Sustainability Effect Luis Beldroega @luisbeldroega In order for better understanding the implications on the world wide economy, I will presente a comparison between 2 different economies, their growth models, their history, strengths, shortages and consequences for the future, by the numbers The economies of the United States of America & China CHAPTER 1: Unsustainable Growth Models FIRST THE BASICS 1. % of GDP Growth As we can see, apart from the growth rate generated after covid, the US trend line of Growth is trending down over the years Average percentage of GDP growth over the last 25 years is around 2% According to the Bureau of Economics analysis, they estimate a rate of Growth for 2024, in the United States of around 2.8% Concerning China, it has presented a stable/consistent line of growth over the last 2 decades, with an average rate above 5% Current  consensus around China growth rate for 2024 is for the country to achieve a 5% growth rate , a...
Read more

About Myths - Monetary vs Finance vs Economy

Image
The image and the data concerning the working papers presented in this post, were presented initially in our Webpage, here " Economics the Power of Numbers ". Concerning the Economic Data and the Monetary Policy, this presentation will concentrate the analyse in the years from 1990 to 2012. The Myth - Flooding the financial markets with money, will have, eventually, a direct impact or at least a substantial impact in the Real Economy, creating and promoting the conditions for countries to grow. The Following graphic presents the most important sets of monetary aggregates and their evolution since 1990 to 2012 Another view at the same set of data, for better understanding ... Notes: Data from China is presented divided by "3" and Japan divided by "100", in order to make visible the complete sets of data from the other aggregates. The objective is to present the trends and the evolution of the aggregates in percentage from 199...
Read more

Different things require a different approach

Image
We should not compare the time of the Great Depression and his theories with Nowadays. These are two completely different situations. A closed economy in the 1930's and a fully open and unbalanced economy as it is today. Back then, the US had a closed market and the country was mostly self sufficient. Most goods were made within the country's doors and the main global financial markets weren't that interconnected, as they are today, and also, financial capital wasn't so volatile. But during the last decade, the US is running high external deficits, accumulating budget deficits and running extremely low savings rates. What the US have created, nowadays with all the QE's towards finance, is an asset bubble, that will go away when the QE's stop. Ben Bernanke is wrong, just as it was his predecessor Alan Greenspan. Unregulated markets will only serve the most powerful side of the Market. Basic regulation is needed. More QE money in an unbalanced economy, will onl...
Read more